Hi,Michael,Thank you very much for your answer.
address of 40001/x,It's going to take up too many VT Tags, and we want to save costs
I need to read and control a lot of status words from the PLC. The bit in each word mean different things so I need to break it down. Since I need to save the use of Tags, I choose to use Bit([Tag03], 0) instead of 40001/X, which is used to read Tags. Now I need to use the set Tags, and since I want to save variable points, I want to use setBit() to manipulate the variable , just like I used Bit() to set the Tag through Calc
Hi,Michael,Thank you very much for your answer.
address of 40001/x,It's going to take up too many VT Tags, and we want to save costs
I need to read and control a lot of status words from the PLC. The bit in each word mean different things so I need to break it down. Since I need to save the use of Tags, I choose to use Bit([Tag03], 0) instead of 40001/X, which is used to read Tags. Now I need to use the set Tags, and since I want to save variable points, I want to use setBit() to manipulate the variable , just like I used Bit() to set the Tag through Calc![6123133c33bb3](serve/attachment&path=6123133c33bb3)